Buddhism is a religion and philosophy based on the teachings of the Buddha, Siddhārtha Gautama, who lived between approximately 563 and 483 BCE. Originating in India, Buddhism gradually spread throughout Asia to Central Asia, Sri Lanka, Tibet, Southeast Asia, as well as the East Asian countries of China, Mongolia, Korea, and Japan.
Buddhism teaches followers to perform good and wholesome actions, to avoid
bad and harmful actions, and to purify and train the mind. The aim of these
practices is to end the suffering of cyclic existence, samsara, by awakening the practitioner to the realization of
true reality, the achievement of Nirvana and Buddhahood.
Buddhist morality is underpinned by the principles of harmlessness and
moderation. Mental training focuses on moral discipline (sila), meditative concentration (samadhi), and wisdom (prajñā).
While Buddhism does not deny the existence of supernatural beings (indeed,
many are discussed in Buddhist scripture), it does not ascribe power for
creation, salvation or judgement to them. Like humans, they are regarded as
having the power to affect worldly events, and so some Buddhist schools
associate with them via ritual.
What is a Buddha?
A stone image of the Buddha.
Buddha is a word in ancient Indian languages including Pāli and Sanskrit which means "one who has awakened". It is derived from
the verbal root "budh", meaning "to awaken" or "to be enlightened", and "to
comprehend".
The word "Buddha" denotes not just a single religious teacher who lived in a
particular epoch, but a type of person, of which there have been infinite ones
throughout the course of cosmic time. (As an analogy, the term "American
President" refers not just to one person, but to everyone who has ever held the
office of American presidency.) The Buddha Siddhartha Gautama, then, is simply
one member in the spiritual lineage of Buddhas, which stretches back into
beginningless past and forward into the distant horizons of the future.
Gautama, who is referred to by Buddhists as Shakyamuni Buddha, did not
claim any divine status for himself, nor did he assert that he was inspired by a
god or gods. A Buddha is anyone who has fully awakened to the true nature of
existence, liberated from the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth and has
achieved omniscience. (Buddhas are not omnipotent, like the god of Judaism, Christianity or Islam.)
Anyone can free themselves from suffering as Gautama did, regardless of age, gender, or caste.
The principles by which a person can be led to enlightenment are known as the
Buddhadharma, or simply the Dharma, meaning (in this context) "law, doctrine, or truth".
Origins
As with any history so old, there are many different stories of how the
Buddha to be, Siddhārtha Gautama (Sanskrit; in Pāli, Siddhattha Gotama) made his way to enlightenment.
Here is one:
Legend has it that he was born around the 6th century BCE. His birthplace is said to be Lumbini in the Shākya state, one of a small group of old Hindu
oligarchic republics, in what is now Nepal. His father was a (Hindu) king, and Siddhārtha lived in
luxury, being spared all hardship.
The legends say that a seer predicted shortly after his birth, that
Siddhartha would become either a great king or a great holy man; because of
this, the king tried to make sure that Siddhartha never had any cause for
dissatisfaction with his life, as that might drive him toward a spiritual path.
Nevertheless, at the age of 29, he came across what has become known as the Four Passing Sights: an old crippled man, a sick man, a decaying
corpse, and finally a wandering holy man. These four sights led him to
the realization that birth, old age, sickness and death come to everyone, not
only once but repeated for life after life in succession since beginningless
time. He decided to abandon his worldly life, leaving behind his wife, child and
rank, etc. to take up the life of a wandering holy man in search of the answer
to the problem of birth, old age, sickness, and death.
Indian holy men (sādhus), in those days just as today, often engaged
in a variety of ascetic practices designed to "mortify" the flesh. It was
thought that by enduring pain and suffering, the ātman (Sanskrit; Pāli: atta) or "soul" became free from the cycle of rebirth with its pain and
sorrow. Siddhārtha proved adept at these practices, and was able to surpass his
teachers. However, he found no answer to his problem and, leaving behind his
teachers, he and a small group of companions set out to take their austerities
even further. After nearly starving himself to death with no success (some
sources claim that he nearly drowned), Siddhārtha began to reconsider his path.
Then he remembered a moment in childhood in which he had been watching his
father start the season's plowing, and he had fallen into a naturally
concentrated and focused state in which time seemed to stand still, and which
was blissful and refreshing.
The temple of the Tooth, in
Kandy,
Sri Lanka, which is said to contain Buddha's
tooth
Taking a little buttermilk from a passing goatherd, he found a large tree
(now called the Bodhi tree) and set to meditating. He developed a new way of meditating, which began to
bear fruit. His mind became concentrated and pure, and then, six years after he
began his quest, he attained Enlightenment, and became a Buddha.
According to one of the stories in the Āyācana
Sutta (Samyutta Nikaya VI.1), a scripture found in the Pāli and other canons, immediately after his
Enlightenment the Buddha was wondering whether or not he should teach the
Dharma. He was concerned that, as human beings were overpowered by greed, hatred
and delusion, they wouldn't be able to see the true Dharma which was subtle,
deep and hard to understand. A god, Brahma Sahampati, however, interceded, and
asked that he teach the Dharma to the world, as "There will be those who will
understand the Dharma". With his great compassion, the Buddha agreed to become a teacher. At the Deer
Park near Benares in northern India he set in motion the Wheel of Dharma
by delivering his first sermon to the group of five companions with whom he
sought for enlightenment before. They, together with Buddha, formed the first sangha, the company of Buddhist monks.
In other versions of his life-story, the Buddha leaves home in the "prime of
his youth", his parents weeping and wailing all the while.
The state of Shākya, where he was born, was an oligarchic republic at that time, so there was no royal family of which to
speak. Therefore, it is believed that the Buddha's father was not a king in the
sense of an absolute ruler, but rather an influential tribal figure. However,
regardless of the details of his early life, the evidence strongly indicates
that the Buddha was indeed a historical person living in approximately the same
time and place in which he is traditionally placed.
It has also been advanced that the influence of Jain culture and philosophy in ancient Bihar gave rise to
Buddhism. Buddhist scriptures describe various penances (tapas)
undertaken by Gautama Siddhartha which appear identical to Jain penances (e.g.,
cupping the hands to consume alms, plucking of hair, the penance by five fires,
etc.). Buddhist writings reflect that Jainism was an already established faith
-- rather than a newly founded or reformist one -- by the time Buddha lived. The
Majjhima Nikaya relates instances of Buddha seeking converts from the
apparently sizeable Nigantha (Jain) community. Both philosophies continue
to share similar Prakrit terminology for important themes and teachings. (See
also Jainism)
Principles of Buddhism
The Three Jewels
Buddhists seek refuge in what are often referred to as the Three
Jewels, Triple Gem or Triple Jewel. These are the Buddha, the Dharma (or Dhamma), and the "noble" (Sanskrit: arya) Sangha or community of monks and nuns who have become
enlightened. While it is impossible to escape one's karma or the effects caused by previous thoughts, words and
deeds, it is possible to avoid the suffering that comes from it by becoming
enlightened. In this way, dharma offers a refuge. Dharma, used in the sense of the Buddha's teachings, provides a
raft and is thus a temporary refuge while entering and crossing the river.
However, the real refuge is on the other side of the river.
To one who is seeking to become enlightened, taking refuge constitutes a
continuing commitment to pursuing enlightenment and following in the footsteps
of the people who have followed the path to enlightenment before. It contains an
element of confidence that enlightenment is in fact a refuge, a supreme resort.
Many Buddhists take the refuges each day, often more than once in order to
remind themselves of what they are doing and to direct their resolve inwardly
towards liberation.
In all— forms of Buddhism, refuge in the Three Jewels are taken before the Sangha for the first time, as a part of the conversion ritual.
However, the personal choice for taking ones' life-path in this direction is
more important than any external ritual.
It is good to note that in Buddhism, the word "refuge" should often not be
taken in the English sense of "hiding" or "escape"; instead, many scholars have
said, it ought be thought of as a homecoming, or place of healing, much as a
parent's home might be a refuge for someone. This simple misunderstanding has
led some Western scholars to conclude that Buddhism is "a religion for sticking
one's head in the sand", when most Buddhists would assert quite the opposite. On
the other hand, the main goal of Buddhism is to escape from the suffering of
cyclic existence.
Although Buddhists concur that taking refuge should be undertaken with proper
motivation (complete liberation) and an understanding of the objects of refuge,
the Indian scholar Atisha identified that in practice there are many different
motives found for taking refuge. His idea was to use these different motivations
as a key to resolving any apparent conflicts between all the Buddha's teachings
without depending upon some form of syncretism that would cause as much
confusion as it attempted to alleviate.
In the 11th century, Lamp for the
Path by Atisha, and in the subsequent Lamrim tradition as elaborated by the Tibetan master Tsongkhapa, the several motives for refuge are enumerated as
follows, typically introduced using the concept of the "scope" (level of
motivation) of a practitioner:
- Worldly scope: to improve the lot of this life - but this is not a
Buddhist motivation.
- Low scope: to gain high rebirth and avoid the low realms.
- Middle scope: to achieve Nirvana (liberation from rebirth)
- High scope: to achieve Buddhahood in order to liberate others from
suffering
- Highest scope is also sometimes included: to achieve Buddhahood in this
life.
See also: Three Jewels
The Four Noble Truths
The Buddha taught that life was dissatisfactory because of craving, but that
this condition was curable by following the Eightfold Path. This teaching is called the Four Noble Truths:
- Dukkha: All worldly life is unsatisfactory, disjointed,
containing suffering.
- Samudaya: There is a cause of suffering, which is
attachment or desire (tanha) rooted in ignorance.
- Nirodha: There is an end of suffering, which is Nirvana.
- Marga: There is a path that leads out of suffering, known
as the Noble Eightfold Path.
The Noble Eightfold Path
Main article: Noble Eightfold Path
Buddhist monk Geshe Konchog Wangdu reads Mahayana sutras
from an old woodblock copy of the Tibetan Kanjur.
In order to fully understand the noble truths and investigate whether they
were in fact true, Buddha recommended that a certain lifestyle or path be
followed which consists of:
- Right Understanding
- Right Thought
- Right Speech
- Right Action
- Right Livelihood
- Right Effort
- Right Mindfulness
- Right Concentration
Sometimes in the Pāli Canon the Eightfold Path is spoken of as being a
progressive series of stages which the practitioner moves through, the
culmination of one leading to the beginning of another, but it is more usual to
view the stages of the 'Path' as requiring simultaneous development.
The Eightfold Path essentially consists of meditation, following the
precepts, and cultivating the positive converse of the precepts (e.g. benefiting
living beings is the converse of the first precept of harmlessness). The Path
may also be thought of as a way of developing śīla, meaning mental and moral discipline.
The Five Precepts
Buddhists undertake certain precepts as aids on the path to coming into
contact with ultimate reality. Laypeople generally undertake five precepts. The
Five Precepts are not given in the form of commands such as "thou shalt not
...", but rather are promises to oneself: "I will (try) to...".
The five precepts are:
- To refrain from harming living creatures (killing).
- To refrain from taking that which is not freely given (stealing).
- To refrain from sexual misconduct.
- To refrain from incorrect speech (lying, harsh language, slander, idle
chit-chat).
- To refrain from intoxicants which lead to loss of mindfulness.
It should be noted that the literal, and possibly original, meaning of the
third precept covers more than the now generally standard meaning "sexual
misconduct" and actually involves refraining from "wrong indulgence in all
sensory pleasures".
In some schools of Buddhism, serious lay people or aspiring monks take an
additional three to five ethical precepts, and some of the five precepts are
strengthened. For example, the precept pertaining to sexual misconduct becomes a precept of celibacy; the fourth
precept, which pertains to incorrect speech, is expanded to four: lying, harsh
language, slander, and idle chit-chat. Fully ordained monks and nuns of the
Theravada school also vow to follow the 227 patimokkha rules. Fully ordained Mahayana monks and nuns follow
348 equivalent rules with an additional set of, generally, 41 bodhisattva vows.
See also: Pancasila and Buddha Statues of Bamiyan
The three marks of conditioned existence
According to the Buddhist tradition, all phenomena (dharmas) are marked by three characteristics, sometimes referred
to as the Dharma Seals:
- Anatta (Pāli; Sanskrit: anātman): In Indian philosophy, the
concept of a self is called ātman (that is, "soul" or metaphysical self), which refers to an unchanging,
permanent essence conceived by virtue of existence. This concept and the
related concept of Brahman, the Vedantic monistic ideal, which was regarded as an ultimate ātman for all beings, were indispensable for mainstream Indian
metaphysics, logic, and science; for all apparent things there had to be an
underlying and persistent reality, akin to a Platonic form. The Buddha rejected all concepts of ātman,
emphasizing not permanence, but changeability. He taught that all concepts of
a substantial personal self were incorrect, and formed in the realm of
ignorance. However, in a number of major Mahayana sutras (e.g. the Mahaparinirvana Sutra, the Tathagatagarbha Sutra, the Srimala Sutra, amongst others), the Buddha is presented as
clarifying this teaching and saying that, while the skandhas (constituents of the ordinary body and mind) are not
the Self, there does truly exist an eternal, unchanging, blissful
Buddha-essence in all sentient beings, which is the uncreated and deathless Buddha-nature ("Buddha-dhatu") or "True Self" of the Buddha
himself. This immaculate Buddhic Self (Atman) is in no way to be construed as a mundane, impermanent,
suffering "ego", of which it is the diametrical opposite. On the other hand,
this Buddha-essence or Buddha-nature is also often explained as the
potential for achieving Buddhahood, rather than an existing phenomenon
one can grasp onto as being me or self. It is the opposite of a
personalised, samsaric "I" or "mine". The paradox is that as soon as the
Buddhist practitioner tries to grasp at this inner Buddha potency and cling to
it as though it were his or her ego writ large, it proves elusive. It does not
"exist" in the time-space conditioned and finite mode in which mundane things
are bodied forth. It is presented by the Buddha in the relevant sutras as
ultimately inexplicable, primordially present Reality itself - the living
potency for Buddhahood inside all beings. It is finally revealed (in the last
of the Buddha's Mahayana sutras, the Nirvana Sutra) not as the circumscribed "non-Self", the
clinging ego (which is indeed anatta / anatman), but as the ever-enduring, egoless Great Self or Dharmakaya of the Buddha.
- The scriptural evidence of the Nikāyas and Āgamas is ambivalent with
regard to the Buddha's reported views on the existence or otherwise of a
permanent self (ātman / atta). Though he is clearly reported to
have criticized many of the heterodox concepts concerning a eternal personal
self and to have denied the existence of an eternal self with regards to any
of the constituent elements (skandha) of a being, nevertheless he is
not reported to have explictly denied the existence of a non-personal,
permanent self, contrary to the popular, orthodox view of the Buddha's
teachings. Moreover, when the Buddha predicates "anātman"
(anatta) with regards to the constituents of a being, there is an
grammatical ambivalence in the use of the term. The most natural
interpretation is that he is simply stating that "the constituents are not the
self" rather than "the constituents are devoid of self". This ambivalence was
to prove troublesome to Buddhists after the Buddha's passing. Some of the
major schools of Buddhism which subsequently developed maintained the former
interpretation, but other influential schools adopted the latter
interpretation and took measures to establish their view as the orthodox
Buddhist position. One such proponent of this hard-line "no self" position was
the monk Nagasena who appears in the Questions of King Milinda,
composed during the period of the Hellenistic Bactrian kingdoms of the 2nd and
1st centuries BCE. In this text, Nagasena demonstrates the concept of absolute
'no self' by likening human beings to a chariot and challenges King Milinda to
find the essence of the chariot. Nagasena states that just as a chariot is
made up of a number of things, none of which are the essence of the chariot in
isolation, without the other pieces, similarly no one part of a person is a
permanent entity - we can be broken up into five constituents - body,
sensations, ideation, mental formations and consciousness, the consciousness
being closest to the permanent idea of 'self', but is ever-changing with each
new thought according to this viewpoint.
- According to some thinkers both in the East and the West, the doctrine of
"non-Self", may imply that Buddhism is a form of nihilism or something similar. However, as thinkers like Nagarjuna have clearly pointed out, Buddhism is not simply a
rejection of the concept of existence (or of meaning, etc.) but of the hard
and fast distinction between existence and nonexistence, or rather between
being and nothingness. Phenomena are not independent from causes
and conditions, and do not exist as as isolated things like we perceive them
to be. Philosophers such as Nāgārjuna stress that the lack of a permanent, unchanging,
substantial self in beings and things does not mean that they do not
experience growth and decay on the relative level. But on the ultimate level
of analysis, one cannot distinguish an object from its causes and conditions,
or even object and subject. (This is an idea appearing relatively recently in
Western science.)Buddhism thus has much more in common with Western empiricism, pragmatism, and anti-foundationalism than with nihilism.
- Anicca (Pāli; Sanskrit: anitya): All compounded
phenomena (things and experiences) are inconstant, unsteady, and
impermanent. (Practically) everything is made up of parts, and is dependent on
the right conditions for its existence. Everything is in constant flux, and so
conditions and the thing itself are constantly changing. Things are
constantly coming into being, and ceasing to be. Nothing lasts.
- Dukkha (Pāli; Sanskrit: duḥkha): Because we fail to truly
grasp the first two conditions, we suffer. We desire lasting satisfaction and
happiness, but look for it amongst constantly changing phenomena. We perceive
a self, and act to enhance that self by pursuing pleasure, and seek to prolong
pleasure when the self too is a fleeting phenomenon.
It is by realizing (not merely understanding intellectually, but making
real in one's experience) the three marks of conditioned existence that one
develops Prajñā, which is the antidote to the ignorance that lies at the
root of all suffering.
See also: three marks of existence
Buddha-dhatu ("Buddha-Principle", Buddha-nature)
The Buddha's Mahayana doctrines contain a set of "ultimate" (nitartha)
teachings on the immanence of a hidden core Reality within all sentient beings
which is linked to the eternality of the Buddha and Nirvana. This immanent yet
transcendent essence is variously called, in the key tathagatagarbha sutras which expound it, the Buddha-dhatu
("Buddha-element", Buddha-nature) or the Tathagatagarbha. This Buddha-dhatu is empty of all that is
contingent, painful and impermanent. In the Nirvana Sutra, it is called by the Buddha the "True Self" (to
distinguish it from the "false" worldly self of the five skandhas). It is no less than the unfabricated, uncreated,
uncompounded, immaculate, immortal, all-knowing, radiantly shining Principle of
blissful Buddhahood - the very Dharmakaya. This Tathagatagarbha/ Buddha-dhatu, inherent in all
beings, can never be destroyed or harmed, and yet is concealed from view by a
mass of obscuring mental and moral taints within the mind-stream of the
individual being. Once the Buddha-dhatu is finally seen and known by the
faithful Buddhist practitioner, it has the power to transform that seer and
knower into a Buddha. The doctrine of the Tathagatagarbha/Buddha-dhatu is stated
by the Buddha of the Mahaparinirvana Sutra to be the "absolutely final culmination"
of his Dharma.
Other principles and practices
- Meditation or dhyāna of some form is a common practice in most if not all
schools of Buddhism, for the clergy if not the laity.
- Central to Buddhist doctrine and practice is the law of karma and vipaka; action and its fruition, which happens within the
dynamic of dependent origination (pratītya-samutpāda). Actions
which result in positive retribution (happiness) are defined as skillful or
good, while actions that produce negative results (suffering) are called
unskillful or bad actions. These actions are expressed by the way of mind,
body or speech. Some actions bring instant retribution while the results of
other actions may not appear until a future lifetime. Most teachers are,
however, quick to point out that though it may be a result of someone's
past-life karma that they suffer, this should not be used as an
excuse to treat them poorly; indeed, all should help them and help to
alleviate their suffering, leading to them working to alleviate their own
suffering.
- Rebirth, which is closely related to the law of karma. An
action in this life may not give fruit or reaction until the next life time.
This being said, action in a past life takes effect in this one, making a
chain of existence. The full realization of the absence of an eternal self or
soul (the doctrine of anatta (Pāli; Sanskrit: anātman)) breaks this cycle of
birth and death (samsara).
Vegetarianism
The first lay precept in Buddhism prohibits killing. Many see this
as implying that Buddhists should not eat the meat of animals. However, this is
not necessarily the case. The Buddha made distinction between killing an animal
and consumption of meat, stressing that it is immoral conduct that makes one
impure, not the food one eats. In one of the Pali sutras belonging to the
Theravada lineage of Buddhism, Buddha says that vegetarianism is preferable, but
as monks in ancient India were expected to receive all of their food by begging
they had little or no control over their diet. Furthermore, Buddha did not wish
to lay an extra burden on his lay followers by demanding that the food should be
vegetarian. During the Buddha's time, there was no general rule requiring monks
to refrain from eating meat. In fact, at one point the Buddha specifically
refused to institute vegetarianism and the Pali Canon records the Buddha himself eating meat on several
occasions. There were, however, rules prohibiting certain types of meat, such as
human, leopard or elephant meat. Monks are also prohibited from consuming meat
if the monk witnessed the animal's death or knows that it was killed
specifically for him. This rule was not applied to commercial purchase of meat
in the case of a general who sent a servant to purchase meat specifically to
feed the Buddha. Therefore, eating commercially purchased meat is not
prohibited.
On the other hand, the Buddha in certain Mahayana sutras strongly denounces the eating of meat. In the Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra, the Buddha states that "the
eating of meat extinguishes the seed of great compassion", adding that all and
every kind of meat and fish consumption (even of animals already found dead) is
prohibited by him. The Buddha also predicts in this sutra that later monks will
"hold spurious writings to be the authentic Dharma" and will concoct their own
sutras and mendaciously claim that the Buddha allows the eating of meat, whereas
in fact (he says) he does not. A long passage in the Lankavatara Sutra shows the Buddha weighing strongly in favor of
vegetarianism, since the eating of the flesh of fellow sentient beings is said
by him to be incompatible with the compassion which a Bodhisattva should strive
to cultivate. Several other Mahayana sutras also emphatically prohibit the
consumption of meat.
A solution to this problem was given when monks from the Indian sphere of
influence migrated to China, as of the year 65 AD. There they met followers who
provided them with money instead of food. From those days onwards Chinese
monastics, and others who came to inhabit northern countries, cultivated their
own vegetable plots and bought everything else they needed in terms of food in
the market.
In the modern world, attitudes toward vegetarianism vary by location. In the
Theravada countries of Southeast Asia and Sri Lanka, monks are bound by the
vinaya to accept almost any food that is offered to them, often including meat,
while in China and Vietnam, monks are expected to eat no meat. In Japan and
Korea, some monks practice vegetarianism, and most will do so at least when
training at a monastery, but otherwise they typically do eat meat. In Tibet,
where vegetable nutrition was historically very scarce, and the adopted vinaya
was the Nikaya Sarvāstivāda, vegetarianism is very rare, although the Dalai Lama and other esteemed Lamas invite their audiences to
adopt vegetarianism when they can. In the West, of course, a wide variety of
practices are followed. Lay Buddhists generally follow dietary rules less
rigorously than monks.
The three main branches of Buddhism
Buddhism has evolved into myriad schools that can be roughly grouped into
three types: Nikaya (also called Hinayana), Mahayana, and Vajrayana. Of the
Nikaya schools, only the Theravada survives. Each branch sees itself as
representing the true, original teachings of the Buddha, and some schools
believe that the dialectic nature of Buddhism allows its format, terminology,
and techniques to adapt over time in response to changing circumstances, thus
validating dharmic approaches different from their own.
- The Theravada school, whose name means "Doctrine of the Elders",
bases its practice and doctrine exclusively on the Pali Canon, which is a collection of what are known as agamas or nikaya sutras. The nikaya sutras are generally considered
by modern scholars to be the oldest of the surviving types of Buddhist
literature, and they are accepted as authentic in every branch of Buddhism. Theravada is the only surviving representative of the
historical Nikaya branch. Nikaya Buddhism and consequently Theravada are
sometimes referred to as Hinayana or "inferior vehicle", although this is considered by
some to be impolite. Native Theravada is practiced today in Sri Lanka, Burma,
Laos, Thailand, Cambodia and portions of Vietnam and Malaysia.
- The Mahāyāna (literally "Great Vehicle") branch emphasizes
universal compassion and the selfless ideal of the bodhisattva, whose goal is to achieve Buddhahood in order to
be of greatest benefit to other sentient beings. In addition to the Nikaya scriptures, Mahāyāna schools recognize all or part of a
genre of scriptures that were first put in writing around 1 CE. These scriptures were written in some form of Sanskrit, except a few manuscripts in Prakrit, and are concerned with the purpose of achieving
Buddhahood by following the path of the bodhisattva over the course of what is
often described as countless eons of time. Because of this immense timeframe,
some Mahāyāna schools accept the idea of working towards rebirth in a Pure Land. The Pure Land is normally conceived of as a state
which is not enlightenment in itself but which is a highly conducive
environment for working toward enlightenment, although some sources indicate
that it is synonymous with enlightenment. Native Mahāyāna Buddhism is
practiced today in China, Japan, Korea, and most of Vietnam.
- The Vajrayāna or "Diamond Vehicle" (also referred to as
Mantrayana, Tantrayana, Tantric or esoteric Buddhism) shares the basic concepts of
Mahāyāna, but also includes a vast array of spiritual techniques designed to
enhance Buddhist practice. One component of the Vajrayāna is harnessing
psycho-physical energy as a means of developing profoundly powerful states of
concentration and awareness. These profound states are in turn to be used as
an efficient path to Buddhahood. Using these techniques, it is claimed that a
practitioner can achieve Buddhahood in one lifetime, or even as little as
three years. In addition to the Theravada and Mahāyāna scriptures, Vajrayāna
Buddhists recognise a large body of texts that include the Buddhist Tantras.
Native Vajrayana is practiced today mainly in Tibet, Nepal, Bhutan, Mongolia,
Kalmykia, areas of India, and -- among the Shingon (Zhènyān, 真言) and Tendai schools -- in China and Japan.
At the present time the teachings of all three branches of Buddhism have
spread throughout the world and are now easily available in the developed
countries, and increasingly translated into local languages.
Buddhism after the Buddha
One of the first representations of the
Buddha, 1st-2nd century CE,
Gandhara.
Buddhism spread slowly in India until the powerful Mauryan emperor Asoka converted to it and actively supported it. His promotion
led to construction of Buddhist religious sites and missionary efforts that
spread the faith into the countries listed at the beginning of the article.
After about 500 CE, Buddhism showed signs of waning in India, becoming nearly extinct after about 1200 CE. This was partially due to Muslim invasions and partially due to Hinduism's revival movements such as Advaita and the rise of the bhakti movement.
Elements of Buddhism have remained within India to the current day: the Bauls
of Bengal have a syncretic set of practices with strong emphasis on
many Buddhist concepts. Other areas of India have never parted from Buddhism,
including Ladakh and other areas bordering the Tibetan, Nepali and
Bhutanese borders.
Buddhism also remained in the rest of the world although in Central Asia and
later Indonesia it was mostly replaced by Islam. In China and Japan, it adopted
aspects of the native beliefs of Confucianism, Taoism and Shinto respectively. In Tibet, the Tantric Vajrayana lineage was preserved after it disappeared in
India.
History of the schools
Three months after the passing of Gautama Buddha, The First Council was held
at Rajagaha by his immediate disciples who had attained Arahantship (Enlightenment). Maha Kassapa, the most respected and elderly monk, presided at
the Council. The Dhamma and the Vinaya were recited at the First
Council. All Arahants unanimously agree that no disciplinary rule laid down
by the Buddha should be changed, and no new ones should be introduced. At this
point, no conflict about what the Buddha taught is known to have occurred, so
the teachings were divided into various parts and each was assigned to an elder
and his pupils to commit to memory. These groups of people often cross-checked
with each other to ensure that no omissions or additions were made.
At the Second Council, one hundred years later, it was not the dharma that
was called into question but the monks' code of rules or vinaya. This resulted in the formation of the Sthaviravādin and Mahāsānghika schools. Opinions differ on the cause of the split:
the Sthaviravādins described their opponents as lax monks who had ceased to
follow all the vinaya rules, while the Mahāsānghikas argued that the Buddha had
never intended a rigid adherence to all the minor rules. Apart from Pāli
sources, an important independent account of this split is found in the
Shāriputra-pariprcchā (The Enquiry of Shāriputra), an eclectic text of
Indic origin, which differs radically from the received Theravādin version.
According to this version, the Mahāsānghikas were not the defeated party, but
the conservative party that preserved the original vinaya unchanged against the
reformist attempts of the Sthāviras to establish a reorganized and stricter
version.
However, after this initial division, more were to follow. Schism in early
Buddhism was typically not on points of doctrine (orthodoxy), but in the area of
practice (orthopraxy). So if two schools shared a vinaya, but were in dispute
over doctrinal matters, it was likely that they would continue to practice
together. However, if one group disputed the vinaya of another, this would often
prevent common practice.
In the 3rd century BCE, Theravadin sources state that a Third Council was
convened under the patronage of Emperor Ashoka, but since no mention of this council is found in other
sources and because of various implausible features in this account, most
scholars treat the historicity of this Third Council with skepticism although it
is generally accepted that one or several disputes did occur during Asoka's
reign, involving both doctrinal and vinaya matters, although these are likely to
have been too informal to be called a Council.
However, according to the Theravadin account, this Council was convened
primarily for the purpose of establishing an official orthodoxy. At the council,
small groups raised questions about the specifics of the vinaya and the
interpretation of doctrine. The chairman of the council, Moggaliputta Tissa,
compiled a book called the Kathavatthu, which was meant to refute these arguments. The
council sided with Moggaliputta and his version of Buddhism as orthodox; it was
then adopted by Emperor Ashoka as his empire's official religion. This school of thought
was termed Vibhajjavada (Pali), literally "Teaching of Analysis". The version of the
scriptures that had been established at the Third Council, including the vinaya,
sutta and the abhidhamma commentaries (collectively known as Tripitaka), was
taken to Sri Lanka by Emperor Ashoka's son, the Venerable Mahinda. There it was eventually committed to writing in the Pali language. The Pali Canon remains the only complete set of Nikaya scriptures to survive, although fragments of other
versions exist.
Whatever might be the truth behind the Theravādin account, it was around the
time of Asoka that further divisions began to occur within the Buddhist movement
and a number of additional schools emerged, including the Sarvāstivāda and the Sammitīya. All of these early schools of Nikayan
Buddhism eventually came to be known collectively as the Eighteen Schools in later sources. Unfortunately, with the
exception of the Theravāda, none of early these schools survived beyond the late
medieval period by which time several were already long extinct, although a
considerable amount of the canonical literature of some of these schools has
survived, mainly in Chinese translation. Moreover, the origins of specifically
Mahāyāna doctrines may be discerned in the teachings of some of
these early schools, in particular in the Mahāsānghika and the Sarvāstivāda.
Between the 1st century BCE and the 1st century CE, the terms Mahayana and Hinayana were first used in writing, in, for example, the Lotus Sutra.
A Fourth Council is said to have been convened by the Kushan emperor Kanishka, around 100 CE at
Jalandhar or in Kashmir, although it seems to have been primarily a Sarvāstivāda affair. For this reason, Theravāda Buddhism
does not recognize the authenticity of this council, and sometimes they call it
the “council of heretical monks”.
It is said that Kanishka gathered 500 monks, headed by Vasumitra, primarily, it
seems, to compile extensive commentaries on the Abhidharma, although it is
possible that some editorial work was carried out upon the canon itself. The
main fruit of this Council was the vast commentary known as the Mahā-Vibhāshā ("Great Exegesis"), an extensive
compendium and reference work on a portion the Sarvāstivādin Abhidharma.
Scholars beleieve that it was also around this time that a significant change
was made in the language of the Sarvāstivādin canon, by converting an earlier Prakrit version into Sanskrit. Although this change was probably effected without
significant loss of integrity to the canon, this event was of particular
significance since Sanskrit was the learned language of scholars in India,
regardless of their specific religious or philosophical allegiance, thus
enabling a far wider audience to gain access to Buddhist ideas and practices.
For this reason, all major Budhist scholars in India thereafter wrote their
commentaries and treatises in Sanskrit.
During and after the 2nd century explicitly Mahayana philosophies were defined in the works of Nagarjuna, Asanga, Shantideva, Ashvagosha, and Vasubandhu.
Around the 1st century, Buddhism spread from India through successive waves
of merchants and pilgrims. It reached as far as Turkmenistan and Arabia to the
west, and eastward to southeast Asia, where the first records of Buddhism date
from around 400. Mahayana Buddhism established a major regional center in
what is today Afghanistan, and from there it spread to China, Korea, Mongolia, and Japan. In 475, the Indian monk Bodhidharma travelled to China and established the Chan (Chinese; Japanese: Zen), school. During the first millennium, monks from China such as Faxian, Yijing and Xuanzang made pilgrimages to India and wrote accounts of their
travels when they returned home. These Chinese travel records constitute
extremely valuable sources for information concerning the state of Buddhism in
India during the early medieval period.
At one time, different Turkic and Tocharian groups along the northern fringe of East Turkestan (modern Xinjiang in western China) adhered to Nikaya Buddhism. However, Buddhism there was supplanted by the
introduction of Islam around 1000.
Vajrayana also evolved at this stage carried from India to Tibet from around 800 by teachers such as Padmasambhava and Atisha. There it ini